In terms of price, network cameras are more expensive than analog cameras. However, in terms of function, analog cameras are incomparable, analog signal digitization, video compression transmission, and intelligent control functions. Simulation plus back-end DVR costs with network camera PCs, according to statistics:
> If the IP infrastructure is already installed, the cost of an online video system is always low.
> The total cost of ownership of network video systems with 40 or more cameras is lower than that of analog systems.
> For IP systems and analog systems, 32 cameras are their balance points. In general, if more than 32 cameras are used, the cost of the network video system will be lower. If it is between 16 and 32, the cost difference between the two is not large, and even the cost of the simulation system will be lower.
Cabling construction costs According to a survey of the differences between analog and digital solutions, the cost of the installation, configuration and training of the simulation system is nearly 50% higher than that of the IP system. For example, the wiring cost of an analog system is almost three times the wiring cost of an IP system. The main reason is that coaxial cabling is much more expensive than Ethernet cabling. Moreover, analog systems usually require separate power cables, while Power over Ethernet (PoE) does not require power connections in the IP system. In addition, separate wiring is required to control the analog PTZ camera. The digital wiring adopts a switch node type connection, and the analog system wiring adopts a direct connection type. This greatly saves the wiring cost for the customer. In addition to the existing unit schools and other places, network cabling is readily available and does not require too much arrangement. It only needs to be added; analog monitoring needs to be completely relocated. The front-end to the back-end are All pulled by a line, saving the cost of the wire, which also reduces the construction period and saves labor costs. The network video system allows users to integrate open PC systems with open storage and video management software at a cost that is 20% lower than DVRs.
After-sales Cost The traditional analog monitoring system's after-sales maintenance is very troublesome. It takes a section of the line to troubleshoot the problem, to determine the problem lies in that place, often a small line of the problem needs to spend huge manpower to re-find the line, that is Time-consuming and laborious.
The digital network monitoring system based on the IP network can pass through the existing network test equipment and can find out which line is faulty in the end, which greatly reduces the post-sales cost.
Any advanced features provided by online video require cost. If you only compare the camera costs, the initial cost of the network camera may be higher than that of the analog camera. However, when comparing the cost of each video, SIVIDI network video systems with excellent flexibility and superior performance are comparable to DVR-based analog systems. For many system configurations, the upfront cost of monitoring systems based on network video products is lower.
The extensibility of the scalable network video solution is also more convenient and more economic than the expansion of the analog surveillance system. In the era of analog video surveillance, the cost of remote monitoring on the transmission medium is very large, and with the monitoring The increase in the number of video channels rises linearly, and the cost of a large number of additional matrices and transmission wires ultimately accounts for almost all of the monitoring costs. The scalability of network video solutions is also reflected in storage. Traditional analog video surveillance also requires the purchase of a large number of centralized storage devices and disks, while network video surveillance uses a large number of distributed storage methods and utilizes existing computer disk space. Perform storage management.
> If the IP infrastructure is already installed, the cost of an online video system is always low.
> The total cost of ownership of network video systems with 40 or more cameras is lower than that of analog systems.
> For IP systems and analog systems, 32 cameras are their balance points. In general, if more than 32 cameras are used, the cost of the network video system will be lower. If it is between 16 and 32, the cost difference between the two is not large, and even the cost of the simulation system will be lower.
Cabling construction costs According to a survey of the differences between analog and digital solutions, the cost of the installation, configuration and training of the simulation system is nearly 50% higher than that of the IP system. For example, the wiring cost of an analog system is almost three times the wiring cost of an IP system. The main reason is that coaxial cabling is much more expensive than Ethernet cabling. Moreover, analog systems usually require separate power cables, while Power over Ethernet (PoE) does not require power connections in the IP system. In addition, separate wiring is required to control the analog PTZ camera. The digital wiring adopts a switch node type connection, and the analog system wiring adopts a direct connection type. This greatly saves the wiring cost for the customer. In addition to the existing unit schools and other places, network cabling is readily available and does not require too much arrangement. It only needs to be added; analog monitoring needs to be completely relocated. The front-end to the back-end are All pulled by a line, saving the cost of the wire, which also reduces the construction period and saves labor costs. The network video system allows users to integrate open PC systems with open storage and video management software at a cost that is 20% lower than DVRs.
After-sales Cost The traditional analog monitoring system's after-sales maintenance is very troublesome. It takes a section of the line to troubleshoot the problem, to determine the problem lies in that place, often a small line of the problem needs to spend huge manpower to re-find the line, that is Time-consuming and laborious.
The digital network monitoring system based on the IP network can pass through the existing network test equipment and can find out which line is faulty in the end, which greatly reduces the post-sales cost.
Any advanced features provided by online video require cost. If you only compare the camera costs, the initial cost of the network camera may be higher than that of the analog camera. However, when comparing the cost of each video, SIVIDI network video systems with excellent flexibility and superior performance are comparable to DVR-based analog systems. For many system configurations, the upfront cost of monitoring systems based on network video products is lower.
The extensibility of the scalable network video solution is also more convenient and more economic than the expansion of the analog surveillance system. In the era of analog video surveillance, the cost of remote monitoring on the transmission medium is very large, and with the monitoring The increase in the number of video channels rises linearly, and the cost of a large number of additional matrices and transmission wires ultimately accounts for almost all of the monitoring costs. The scalability of network video solutions is also reflected in storage. Traditional analog video surveillance also requires the purchase of a large number of centralized storage devices and disks, while network video surveillance uses a large number of distributed storage methods and utilizes existing computer disk space. Perform storage management.
Injection Mold,Custom Injection Mold,Making Injection Mold
Cabinet Lock,Padlock Series Co., Ltd. , http://www.zlcody.com