Recently, Chen Baoguang, deputy chairman of the China Furniture Association and secretary general of the China Furniture Association Solid Wood Furniture Committee, revealed that the national standard of "General Technical Conditions for Wooden Furniture", which has been implemented for many years, is about to face adjustments. With the rapid development of the country, this national standard faces some practical problems in practice. It has been unable to adapt to industry norms and standards, and has reached a point where it can be revised.
Â
Â
Standard setting without enterprise participation
Â
In the decoration and decoration industry, the solid wood is generally classified into three categories: all solid wood, solid wood mixed, and veneer solid wood. These three types are basically similar to the solid wood furniture category. There are also many disputes in the national definition.
Â
It is reported that the national standard that began to implement, the controversy mainly comes from the definition of " solid wood furniture ", this standard defines "solid wood furniture" as "solid wood furniture." But nowadays, the market is chaotic. Everyone calls themselves furniture as solid wood furniture, but according to the 2009 national standard, there are no mistakes. However, the difference in the price of solid wood in the market has increased, and there are several times and hundreds of times.
Â
From the definition, according to the proportion of solid wood materials and technology, solid wood furniture can be divided into three categories: all solid wood furniture, solid wood furniture and solid wood veneer furniture. Before the introduction of the standard, solid wood furniture was always a vague concept, and there was no standardized definition. "Literally speaking, there is no problem, but in the actual implementation process, it objectively caused harm to the industry's benign competition order and promoted an unsustainable consumption concept." An industry source told reporters that this From the formulation of a standard to its promulgation and implementation, it did not consult any enterprise, did not consider the specific conditions of the sales market, and did not involve any enterprise.
Â
Materialism only drove good products out of inferior products
Â
At the beginning of the formulation, it was considered that more and more panel furniture was covered with a "skin", and then it was declared to be solid wood furniture, which caused a lot of consumer disputes. In this sense, the establishment of national standards is necessary and urgent.
Â
This national standard was not comprehensive and complete when it was formulated, but instead gave many small companies without a brand and strength an opportunity to enter the market. "Some small enterprises that can't even pass through solid wood production technology, as long as they become" all solid wood "in raw materials, they can gain a foothold in the market and get huge profits." The impact of the new solid wood standard already exists, but the 'non-full solid wood' products Consumer misunderstanding. A technical standard has caused chaos in the market, which everyone had not expected. "
Â
Chen Baoguang also said that it is indeed a pity that the formulation of solid wood standards without the participation of enterprises, he revealed that the revision of this standard has been put on the agenda. Chen Baoguang believes that the current chaos in the furniture industry is not entirely due to the introduction of standards, but is determined by many factors, including consumers blindly pursuing materials, and the industry lacks brand companies. (Editor: Peter)
Â
Poly Aluminium Chloride Flocculant (PAC), Chloinated Polyethylene (CPE), Tripe Sodium Phosphate, Disodium Phosphate
YIBIN PERFEC INTERNATIONAL TRADE CO.,LTD , https://www.yibinbofei.com